presents
Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics
www.datatrace.com
Tracking Pixel
Search Site by Word
My Account

TKR: Effects of Component Rotation




- Discussion:
    - if there is free movement at hip, subtalar & mid-tarsal joints rotation at the knee is not essential for
            restricted function of prosthetic joint;
            - in contrast, an arthrodesed ipsilateral hip is a relative contra indication to knee replacement,
                  for it prevents rotation of thigh as well as changing position of center of gravity of body;

- Prosthetic Design:
    - rotation of the femoral component:
    - rotation of tibial component:
    - need for component rotation:
            - in constrained components which eliminate rotation, aseptic loosening of components is the most common complication;
              - increased loosening forces created at limit of extension & lateral bending w/
                    constrained prosthesis result in higher rates of mechanical loosening of components;
    - rotation can be designed into the knee prosthesis by using a smaller radius of curvature for femoral component;
            - this will reduce the area of contact with the more open tibial surface, but will also increase joint pressure and wear;
    - in the report by Barrack et al, the authors sought to correlate anterior knee pain with TKR component malrotation;
            - significant anterior knee pain rating at least 3 of 10 on the visual analog scale was present in 16 knees (13 patients);
            - 11 patients with 14 symptomatic knees agreed to undergo CT scanning to accurately determine the rotation of the tibial and femoral components;
            - epicondylar axis and tibial tubercle were used as references using a previously validated technique;
            - there was a highly significant difference in tibial component rotation between the two groups w/ the patients w/
                    anterior knee pain averaging 6.2° internal rotation compared with 0.4° external rotation in the control group;
            - there also was a significant difference in combined component rotation with the patients w/ anterior knee pain avg
                    4.7° internal rotation compared with 2.6° external rotation in the control group;
            - there was no significant difference in the degree of radiographic patellar tilt or patellar subluxation between the two groups;
            - patients with combined component internal rotation were more than five times as likely to
                    experience anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty compared with those with combined
                    component external rotation;
            - ref: Component Rotation and Anterior Knee Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty
                    Robert L. Barrack, MD. CORR 2001;2001:46-55




Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Pitfalls in
    the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty.

Varus-valgus and rotational stability in rotationally unconstrained
      total knee arthroplasty.





Original Text by Clifford R. Wheeless, III, MD.