presents
Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics
www.smith-nephew.com
Tracking Pixel

Three cancellous bone screws versus a screw-angle plate in the


treatment of Garden I and II fractures of the femoral neck. AU: Kuokkanen-H et al. SO: Acta-Orthop-Belg. 1991; 57(1): 53-7 AB: A consecutive clinical series of 33 patients with either an undisplaced (Garden I) or minimally displaced (Garden II) femoral neck fracture was randomly divided into two operative protocols. Half of the fractures were treated with three cannulated cancellous bone screws, while the other half were treated with a standard screw-angle plate device. After a mean follow-up of 2 years, 4 patients had died, while 20 of the remaining 29 hips showed excellent or good, 3 fair and 6 poor functional results. The three-screw fixation seemed to yield more technical complications as compared to the screw-angle plate fixation. However, the differences in functional end-results were of no clear statistical significance. We conclude that the screw-angle plate device gives acceptable results in this group of fractures. The use of cannulated hip screws may be more advantageous in the treatment of dislocated femoral neck fractures, where the torsional strength of fracture fixation and femoral head viability are more critical. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital fracture of the femoral neck. A prospective randomised trial of cemented Thompson and uncemented Moore stems. AU: Emery-RJ; Broughton-NS; Desai-K; Bulstrode-CJ; Thomas-TL SO: J-Bone-Joint-Surg-Br. 1991 Mar; 73(2): 322-4 AB: We performed a randomised prospective trial to compare the results of 27 cemented and 26 uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties in active patients with displaced subcapital fractures of the femoral neck. After a mean follow-up of 17 months, significantly more of the uncemented group were experiencing pain in the hip and using more walking aids than the patients in the cemented group. The incidence of postoperative complications, the early mortality rate and the operating time and blood loss were not significantly different. Using otherwise identical prostheses the early results were much better with a cemented Thompson stem than with an uncemented Austin Moore stem.



Original Text by Clifford R. Wheeless, III, MD.